Reflux medicines make the list of top ten most prescribed drugs in the world. If your baby or child is on one, your gastroenterologist (GI doctor) probably prescribed it to lower stomach acid for presumed gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
In your doctor’s eyes, these drugs are considered generally well tolerated and are not considered harmful to adults or even children. The problem is that (some of ) these drugs are only approved for short term use in children – but, it’s common to leave babies, toddlers or older children on them for months or even years at a time. I see this in my pediatric nutrition practice all too often! When these drugs are taken for months at a time, there is potential for serious side effects that can cause lasting digestive and immune system issues.
Another dilemma with getting a PPI for GERD is that the diagnosis is typically based on a brief conversation with mom about spit up, colic, or vomiting. Rarely seen is an actual diagnostic test for whether someone needs this drug – in adults or kids. Measuring stomach acid is the confirming diagnostic for “excess stomach acid”. This requires an invasive endoscopy procedure which must be performed under sedation or anesthesia. Even with endoscopy, if inflammation is seen in the esophagus’ tissue during that procedure, it is assumed that excess stomach acid is the cause. The only way to assure if this is actually true is to add a pH probe to the endoscopy procedure. This probe measures the pH (acid level) in the stomach.
Another way to confirm is to observe stomach acid actually entering the esophagus (that is, stomach contents are going up instead of down) with a barium swallow and observing results, live in real time, on X ray.
If a pH probe shows that the stomach is indeed too acidic, a PPI may indeed help. If the problem is normal acid levels that gurgle backwards up in to esophagus, a PPI may help, or may not help at all – it may make the problem worse over time. And here’s the other twist: Even weak stomach acid (at a pH of 3 or 4) is still too acid for delicate esophagus tissue. But it’s too weak to do a good job of moving food out of the stomach and into the small intestine. So, this leaves food sitting in the stomach, and gurgling back up in to the esophagus. A PPI may temper that burning sensation a bit, but it will not solve the problem of getting food moving along in the other direction – in fact, it will make food sit longer in the stomach, giving more opportunity for the food to gurgle backwards into esophagus. This is exactly how many of my young patients end up needing more, more, and more reflux medicine… until it stops working even at the highest dose.
Babies normally have some spit up or vomiting. If your baby is clearly in pain, crying hard, unable to eat, and not growing or gaining, then a PPI can offer some temporary relief. Likewise, if your doctor saw highly irritated esophageal tissue on an endoscopy, then a short term use of PPIs may soothe the situation. Babies should not be left to cope with pain when a medication can immediately help.
Create a strategy up front with your doctor to use those tools temporarily. A switch in feeding can often make a big difference. Changing a breastfeeding mom’s diet can help, by removing foods like dairy, eggs, or high FODMAPs foods like onions, garlic, apples, prunes, or broccoli.
Formula fed babies can improve with a switch to something more digestible: Consider hydrolyzed formulas like Alimentum Ready To Feed, or formulas with a different protein profile like Gerber Soothe (more whey, less casein), or a goat milk formula option. All of these are worthy measures before placing your baby on a reflux medicine.
There are also gentle herbal glycerite tinctures for children that soothe the stomach and gently encourage normal digestive function. One of my favorites is Gaia Herbs Tummy Tonic, which I’ve used with success for many years in my pediatric nutrition practice. This herbal tincture is one of may herbal blends known as digestive bitters. They gently stimulate the stomach to produce its own normal array of acids so digestion can begin.
Since reflux drugs lower stomach acid, they also lower the protection we get from having that natural acidic barrier between the big bad world and our bodies. This acid barrier is supposed to be very acidic. A gastric juice pH as low as 1.0 is normal. This can prevent harmful bacteria that may be in our mouths from entering the body. But if the stomach pH gets too high – that is, if it becomes less acidic – this matters for 3 key reasons:
Long term PPI use can disrupt healthy gut microbiomes, and favor yeast or fungal species. Over time, these drugs can make weak, picky appetites, weak protein digestion, weak absorption of minerals like iron and zinc, and poor B12 absorption. You can…
Give this project some time, especially for kids who have used a PPI for more than 3-4 months. Gradually a healthy appetite without bloating, hiccups, gas, constipation or pain can be restored.
Thanks to Rosanne Walsh, AADP board certified nutrition and health coach and RD intern for building this blog post with Judy!
Picky eating is for real. No, you didn’t cause it by feeding the wrong foods or being a bad parent. It may have snuck up on your child through background noise in the digestive tract that nobody noticed! Good news: Picky eaters can make full turn arounds, and it may be easier than you think.
Picky eaters can get entrenched enough to profoundly affect their health, development, and functioning. Reversing picky eater behavior focuses mostly on that – behavior. Therapists strategize on how to present food, how to desensitize toddlers and kids to new food textures, and of course, on ruling out any mechanical swallowing concerns (important to rule out with your pediatric OT or SPL). It’s a slow, arduous process. There are many dozens of specialist clinics for pediatric feeding disorders in the US (find one here if you like!) that will work with young children with this approach, to teach new habits and less defensiveness around food.
But what I always wondered is this: Why did picky eating even become a thing in the first place? It truly did not used to be. No, we are not all that much smarter at noticing this stuff than we were a generation ago. Kids mostly just… ate. Sure, some of us had our finicky stretches. But this was so not in the pediatric nutrition landscape that my training – graduate, undergraduate, and clinical rotations – made zero mention of the extreme picky eating now so common in kids: Picky eater behavior bad enough to cause growth failure, malnutrition, frequent infections, need for a feeding tube, or clinical intervention.
What happened? This was the question for me, as a dietitian nutritionist working with these kids. Why would a child “choose” to start aversive eating – in infancy? Or even as an older kid, when the diagnosis might become “avoidant restrictive eating disorder” (ARFID). I couldn’t get my head around that part. I figured there has to be a reason why this gets rolling in the first place.
ARFID diagnostic criteria include this statement: “The eating disturbance is not attributable to a concurrent medical condition”.
Is that true? Or maybe the problem is … we need to do a better job of ruling that out.
When things are out of balance in the stomach and digestive tract, or when certain nutrients are depleted, kids become picky. Very picky, and their desire or even tolerance for food can drop out (same with elders, whose stomach acid diminishes in later years, and who are often given medications that stop appetite). Identify and fix these out-of-balance issues, and appetite can be restored. I have supported kids in this very way, many times in my clinical pediatric nutrition practice. And they make brilliant turn arounds. They eat, they poop, they stop throwing up or gagging, and they grow. But best of all, they go out and play again and they stop worrying about food.
In the kids who have come into my practice with ARFID, picky eating, and growth failure from these circumstances, I usually find that there has been no nutrition screening done for them – not even basic lab studies to screen for the most ordinary, but highly impactful, nutrition deficits that can mess with appetite. I’m often the first to look! I will scrutinize causes for things that can cause pain, or make a child feel full all the time, or trigger gagging and texture aversions. And, I find them.
What this means is that picky eater “behavior” is often not so much a behavior as a response to the body trying to cope with something out of balance. Eventually kids will develop behavioral responses that seem counterproductive and exasperating to us adults – as they experience stress from being forced to try to eat things that they can’t digest, or to eat foods that may cause pain they can’t verbalize.
Here are some nutrition and gut features that will trigger or worsen picky eating:
Endoscopies, celiac blood tests, and basic lab screenings like CBC and chemistry panels will often look normal – but all these other issues can be in play, wrecking your kid’s appetite. These should be ruled out too, before solely relying on cognitive therapy for ARFID or feeding therapy with an OT. Without clearing underlying physiological impediments to a good appetite, behavior based therapies will creep along at a painfully slow pace or fail entirely – which I have seen countless times!
Back to my original question. Why did picky eater behavior ever even become such a thing, to the degree that we have clinics in every city to help change this behavior?
Here’s my 2p: Barring mechanical or structural impediments to normal feeding, picky eating has been caused by overmedication of kids in the last generation or so. Before oral antibiotics were so widely used, before so many early doses of vaccinations were given in the first two years, before reflux medications became so popular for infants and kids, our gut biomes evolved naturally. This allowed normal appetite and digestive skill to progress uninterrupted. But since the late 1980s, we “interrupt” this process with many pharmaceutical interventions, from birth on – even for “healthy” kids.
When digestion is in tact, appetite evolves naturally, and vice versa. Many kids I’ve worked with have spontaneously changed eating habits once they have comfort and ease with digesting food. Screening for nutrition problems that disrupt this process can go far in helping your child enjoy food more readily, and to become a relaxed eater for greater variety.
This does get harder for older kids who have experienced more pain, trauma and frustration with feeding clinics that failed for them. Many of them also go on to fail with psychiatric medications, as they are diagnosed with having a “behavior” problem rather than a physical one. Eating disorders with a psychological component need help on both levels – with counseling and support, and good nutrition screening and strategizing.
Early on, protect your baby’s gut by letting it develop its innate skill for digesting and enjoying food. Use antibiotics only when truly necessary with your doctor’s guidance. Use restorative probiotics and pre-biotic foods. Consider spreading out, delaying, or deferring vaccinations until your baby is older, especially if you are breastfeeding – which gives the protective immunoglobulins and immune defenses that your baby needs. You might be amazed to see the progression of a healthy appetite in action!
For toddlers and older kids who are picky, stay tuned for resources on busting this pattern by following me on facebook here. Repairing gut dysbiosis, replenishing imbalanced minerals, and addressing other underlying problems can turn this around.
I’m a pediatric nutritionist with long experience, and I wish you’d stop talking so much about food and nutrition with your kids.
That sounds crazy, I know. Food and nutrition are absolutely pivotal for your kids’ brains, behavior, growth, mood, learning… everything. No wonder then that food, recipes, and nutrition talk are all over the internet and mom blogger universe. From how to make killer bento lunches to keto for kids (mistake, BTW, unless under certain circumstances), everyone has something to say.
The good thing about this is that we are all woke now on the importance of what we eat, where food comes from, and how we grow it, whether it’s chickens, chocolate, or chard. We really are what we eat. We eat, and we turn the food into us – hair, bones, teeth, mood, and all. Period. That’s pretty much it (though a lot can go wrong along that path.. fixing that for kids is pretty much what I do).
But… there is a HUGE downside, and it’s bad for kids. It creates undue anxiety, stress, and overwhelm for kids, young ones and teens alike. It really stresses moms out too. I run into this often in my clinical practice, and I can tell you that it has gotten worse as our (justified!) enthusiasm for whole, healthy foods has exploded in the last 10-15 years. You’ll want to avoid these pitfalls with your kids. Here’s my list of Fail vs Fabulous, when encouraging healthy nutrition and food habits in your family.
It’s so easy to label a food “good” or “bad”. There’s plenty of junk out there, including organic junk. Obviously, it isn’t what kids should live on. But don’t drill these labels into your kids’ minds. What they need to learn is discernment – and they will. Eventually, ideally, when they’re out and about on their own without you, those “bad” foods should be neutral to them.
What do I mean by “neutral”? I mean that the idea of eating that food doesn’t provoke anxiety. It isn’t even compelling, because it was never forbidden in the first place. It doesn’t elicit judgment or shaming for themselves, or toward friends and peers who eat those foods.
As long as there is no safety or egregious comfort issue – as in, needing an Epi Pen, or a vomit-to-shock (FPIES) reaction, hives, migraine, nausea, bloating, burning diarrhea, disabling gas pain – then let kids have forays into junk. Not daily staples or regular snacks, mind you, but occasional dabbling.
Instead: Provide treats for special occasions (or every so often for no reason other than it’s fun) with no discussion about whether it’s “good” or “bad”. Again, safety issues and food allergens or triggers aside, simply make or buy some fun food, and let your child enjoy, care-free.
My one exception: Spoiled food. This IS bad and dangerous and kids need to learn that too. So, tell them.
Speaking of discernment, forget needing your four year old to have it. That’s your job. Children do not need to know what organic is, or glyphosate, or MSG, colors, additives, gluten or what have you. They shouldn’t care either. They’re little and they have much more important stuff going on in their little worlds. Please stop walking them through the supermarket and asking them to pay attention to labels or what you’re buying. Believe me, they are observing. They don’t need the specifics, and this will only be information overload that can lead to anxiety or meal time control battles. They need you to be chill, in charge, and happy that you’re with them (most the time). That’s about it.
Instead: Lead by example. Say less, do more. If your child accompanies you shopping, let them day dream and leave them alone; if they love chatter, join them in the randomness of it. Your child doesn’t need every moment to be teachable!
If they see something truly junky or sugary or processed that they pitch a fit for (and they will, because supermarkets place colorful cartoony packaging at your child’s eye level on purpose), that’s your call. Sometimes we can get away with floating to the next aisle with a soothing “Hmm no I don’t want to do that today” (and refrain from giving a reason why). Other days, you know the both of you don’t have it in you to make it home without giving in. Up to you, but avoid each supermarket trip rewarded with a junk treat.
If you’re in servitude to your stove or kitchen and miserable making all this scratch beautiful food, guess what – your kids know. Even your baby can tell. The most important thing here is that you get to be happy and enjoy food. Even if there are stressors, including big ones, about what can be safely eaten in your household, endeavor to find the joy in some of it. Joy is, above all else, why we’re here.
You’re in charge. You’re the adult. If you know your child does poorly with a particular food, and they are fiendish about getting it and asking for it constantly anyway, oh well! You know best and have decided that they’re not going to have that food, period. Remember: This goes for foods that are a known danger or debilitating to your child – not for foods that are imperfect, but harmless.
Explaining and justifying your parenting choices to a young child (or even a teen) is, um, a bad idea. Doing so engenders entitlement in your child, which can make their opposition and protests even bigger. In little ones, expect tantrums, anxiety, and meltdowns when you try the “here’s why” route. In teens, expect impressive arguments, brooding, and door slamming. Most of all, don’t expect or need your kids to agree with you.
Instead: If a child asks for a reason why, offer it in the most developmentally concrete way for that child’s age. Refrain from volunteering comments like “it’s bad for you” or “will make you sick” or “your body can’t have that.” Don’t label the food or your child’s body as defective or bad.
Younger kids can be redirected with “there isn’t any more of that at the store so I found this one instead” or “I think this will feel really good in your tummy. Let’s try it and you let me know.”
Teens are reaching a point of practicing discernment on their own. Experimentation and screw ups are par for the course at this age. Let them experience the discomfort of eating the wrong food. You will decide when you have had enough as a parent: “I realize this isn’t what you want, but I am the one taking care of/rescuing you each time you feel sick from eating xyz. So, that food is no longer going to be in the house, and I won’t buy it anymore. If you eat it on purpose outside of here, I won’t be able to help you.” And then there’s always “..because I am the one buying the food, and I said so.”
Oh dear. How many, many food diaries I have seen that look this beautiful: Green smoothies, pumpkin seeds, sprouted Einkorn homemade bread, kombucha, fermented kvass, homemade dosa, coconut flour pancakes, avocado toast, bone broth… Or, a list of light veggie snacks all day long: Carrots, celery, nori, cucumbers, and apple slices with a few cashews. Or, a food diary that shows me 120 grams of protein and less than 60 grams of carbs (a nearly ketogenic intake).
Those are beautiful foods. Some kids really love this stuff. But, usually, it turns out this is a little dysfunctional. There are too many food rules in the house, and it’s causing tension to comply so stringently with eating only organic, perfect whole foods.
I’ll also usually discover that in these households, kids are falling off their growth patterns, experiencing stunting, or underweight. What tends to happen here is kids end up low for total calories, low for carbohydrates, and high for fats and protein. This is a great eating style for adults (who are not growing), but it can cause stunting and underweight in children.
Here is a common anecdote from my practice: I began working with a mom whose child was eating an overly restricted diet. Mom removed all processed foods entirely, based on the belief that any of them, at any time, are bad. Her child also happened to be a picky eater and refused many textures, limiting her choices more. On top of this, based on a misinterpreted blood test for a food sensitivity panel that the mom had somehow done on her own prior to our meeting, the child was only allowed to eat 7 foods, and had been eating this very restricted diet for years. She was not growing, had miserable behavior and sleep problems, and was trending toward anemia.
It turned out, right off the bat, the child could eat many foods that mom had wrongly assumed were trouble. A shift in view point on the good vs bad food mythology helped a lot. The child’s behavior improved immediately and she gained some much needed weight. Finally, her brain and body were getting replenished.
But even after a few sessions, things didn’t sound quite right. So I asked for an updated food diary. Mom shared a usual day food intake of small quantities, throughout the day, of raisins, peanuts, maple syrup, rice, potato chips, and a brownie. That was it. That was a usual day of food. This explained the re-emerging problems: No protein, no good fats or oils, too little food over all, a grazing pattern, and few micronutrient rich foods (for vitamins and minerals).
Mom said this child would sometimes eat chicken. So I asked – what if you gave a chicken nugget, would she like that, or try it?
A big silence followed. Mom was stunned. She had never done that, and wouldn’t, “because, you know, they’re so junky.” We agreed to give it a try after a quick search gave us some brand options she could live with. There are ready to heat and eat versions of this stuff that aren’t so terrible, or are gluten free too.
Instead – This child was already eating a junky poor diet. It didn’t matter if the peanuts and maple syrup were organic. Those alone don’t make up a whole foods diet. So, toss in some fun. Find some ready to serve, heat-and-eat stuff so you don’t have to work so hard cooking it all from scratch. If you hit on something, then you can make your own scratch version even better if you like.
Let kids be kids. They need different diets than adults. They shouldn’t be eating they way you do, most likely. Peruse my blog for more ideas and tips on how kids eat, what they need, and some recipes to try.
No, babies and children don’t know what they need all the time, and don’t necessarily have a keen inner wisdom that they can tap at a moment’s notice. Some babies wean because they feel eager and ready to move on. Some can’t get there, and won’t, even when it is safer and healthier for them to do so. Don’t pressure your young child to know everything. I’ve met many toddlers way past the day they needed to wean, and mom is still waiting for permission to do so. Nope nope nope. You’re in charge, mom.
Likewise, toddlers and kids need direction too. Weaned or not, presenting food all day long in a parade of choices is often just plain overwhelming and frustrating for little kids. It’s too demanding to expect that they will know what to do. This strategy can create anxiety in young kids, while mom or dad get super frustrated by the poor growth and picky appetite that this can often trigger too.
Instead – Make food a benign or pleasant background piece. At snack or meal times, it’s just there, beckoning. Allow a choice between 2, maybe 3 foods at most. Present mixed textures and novelty, including foods that might be messy or that require mastery of a utensil. Let your child feed himself or get messy. Good help can be had with a pediatric occupational therapist if need be – let your doctor know you’d like help, and get a referral, if feeding is so stalled that your child isn’t growing or gaining well.
…when I said that the most important reason why we are all here is joy. Eating and food are great paths to create it, share it, grow it. More than anything you say or do around food in your household, making food a generally positive, inquisitive, and expansive experience is what will create good self care and eating habits in your growing family. For extreme picky eaters, you may have other problems afoot that need tackling. Check out my e book here for more details on how to redirect that too.
Can you even remember not knowing the word “covid”? We’ve spent most of 2020 locked down, wearing masks, avoiding travel, skipping the gym, refusing social contact, learning and working from home (if you still have your job), deferring doctor’s appointments and health care, and cooking at home all the time. We’ve lost loved ones, some of whom have died alone due to strict covid lockdown rules. We’ve lost connection with our communities.
So why is this virus still here, and apparently, flourishing? Didn’t all this effort matter?
I recently asked a colleague to assist me with a regression analysis to examine how states with the earliest and strictest lockdown measures fared, in terms of their death rates from covid. Did more lockdown measures mean reduced death rates?
What we found might surprise you – it sure surprised me!
Each dot is a state, and you can see that the states are pretty well scattered around. This implies that the correlation between restrictions and death rates, if there is one at all, is probably weak, and that other variables are in play. But, we needed the regression analysis, to show for sure if this was true.
Here’s what happened: The red line shown in this graph is where the regression analysis fell. A weak correlation was found, showing that more restrictions were weakly correlated with higher death rate.
In other words, states with more restrictions had higher death rates – the exact opposite of what we expected!
This analysis brings up a lot of questions: Did tougher lockdown measures create more collateral deaths? Or were they not strict enough? Is this why covid is making a comeback right now? If we depend so completely on lockdowns and nothing else, this analysis suggests we may continue to lose the fight against covid.
This analysis does not evaluate cause, only correlation. We all know correlation is not cause. And it is by no means the only analysis we should be performing.
But it begs the question: Are we moving in the wrong direction?
The costs of unilateral masking, lockdowns, restrictions and quarantines have created unsatisfying results, to say the least. Every day, we are bombarded with reports of covid cases on the rise. But little information is reported about death rates (which are not cases, and are also not the same as the numbers of deaths). There is some hopeful news on that score – look at this from California – we can all appreciate this bright spot that deaths are not necessarily increasing as the case number rise, as they did last spring.
When this happens, one possibility is that the virus has mutated to a less lethal form. Another is that treatments may have improved. Surely other possibilities are in play. The frustrating piece for me – as a clinician, and as a professional with public health training – is that no one seems to be asking these questions.
Many of us are stuck in the fear-narrative. Even my scientist friends – geologists, oceanographers, climatologists, engineers, computer scientists – people who pride themselves on being able to understand complex problems – can’t seem to leave the news narrative behind, and embrace some hard facts about this virus and how it behaves in our population.
Once the brain is in fear, it literally can’t reason, or listen. Fear creates distraction. Once we are entrenched enough in fear, we are no longer capable of critical thinking. And it seems this is where the media narrative has led many of us.
We have been told that masks, lockdowns, and closures are all we’ve got to stop the virus, until a vaccine shows up. Fines, arrests, and public shaming have become routine for those who question lockdown strategy. Is this right?
The economic losses, isolation, mental health crises, suicide in teens, loss of loved ones who died alone due to restrictions on visitation; not being able to bury our lost loved ones, or process their deaths, with funeral gatherings prohibited; collateral deaths from lack of access to health care; reduced health from losing access to fitness facilities … the devastation and toll of covid has reached every corner. This is not to even mention the economic losses from lockdowns, staggering in themselves. We have all been affected. I know virtually no one who has not personally experienced loss, tragedy, illness or extreme stress from the covid crisis of 2020.
Restrictive strategies, no doubt, make sense and are effective in certain places: Health care spaces, closed environments, airplanes and so forth. But imposing them indiscriminately, universally, outdoors, or without criteria for who is at risk has cost society too much, and it has not created the result that we are told it is creating.
We need better strategies to meet this challenge.
If you remember the SARS virus outbreak from 2002, you know that corona viruses are not new – but they do work differently than ordinary seasonal flu viruses once they infect a host, and can become dangerous quickly, in susceptible persons. Corona viruses have the largest genome of all the RNA viruses, so they are especially good at producing new variants (that is, mutating quickly), and this may be what we are now seeing with COVID-19. This makes vaccine development an exceptional challenge. Read more here about some of those challenges.
Another suprising piece of covid news that we analyzed: Flu vaccination correlates with higher death rates for covid. We plotted flu shot uptake by state in children against covid death rate by state. Here’s how it fell:
We found a positive correlation between higher covid death rate and percentage of children who received flu shots. States that had higher compliance for children receiving flu shots also had higher covid death rates. Flu shot data came from this CDC site, while state lockdown score came from here.
Once again, this is a correlation. It does not mean flu shots cause covid deaths. It means that perhaps, getting a flu shot isn’t protective as we have been told it is. It may also be a clue as to why some children who seem quite healthy have died from covid, and at the very least, warrants more research.
Whether a flu shot will help or hurt us in fighting covid is a question that some researchers actually looked at. The findings were not what you might expect: Flu shots increased risk of getting corona virus.
Your immune system depends on nutrition and food to build its components and do its work. Masks and restrictions have not done the job we hoped they would, and may be inadvertently making the crisis worse. Flu shots may not help as much as we would like to think either. These possibilities need analysis and critical thinking, and we can’t access that when we are in fear.
Meanwhile, do all you can at home. Maybe shut off your news feed for a bit. Learn here about how you can support strong immune function in your family with food and nutrition. Leverage these to manage covid better for your family. And, keep a calm, open mind – the answers to this pandemic may come in unexpected ways.
Covid is still here, unbelievably – so what can you do to beat it?
You’ve probably heard about inflammatory cytokine storms that can trip a COVID-19 infection from mild and easily beaten, to prolonged, dangerous, or even fatal. Luckily, so far, it appears this happens to a only small percentage of those who get infected: Mortality (death) rates vary, hovering from less than 1 percent to 4-5%. The Americas are the worst place to be. What are we doing wrong?
The role of background inflammation in making COVID a riskier matter is clear. Persons with diabetes, coronary vascular disease, hypertension, or heart disease show significantly higher risk for hospitalization (asthma was at first thought to elevate risk for complications and death, but newer data have not borne this out). All these conditions have an inflammatory component. Lots of people are walking around with no idea that they have background inflammation, or the nutrition problems that go with that. For example…
I believe undiagnosed background inflammatory conditions or processes are part of why some die so quickly from covid, including children, or young strong adults. Was there an unknown, undiagnosed background piece for inflammation that elevated that person’s risk?
Few of the kids in my pediatric nutrition practice ever had screening for inflammation, or for nutrition concerns, before working with me. This is a problem, because your immune system depends on nutrition to function.
In kids, this is very important. The lower a child’s nutrition status, the more likely that child is to get sick more often, have more complicated and longer illnesses, or even die, from infectious diseases. In fact, the single most predictive measure of how a child will fare through an illness is nutrition status, a fact that has been understood for decades. This means that a lot of folks including kids and seemingly well young adults are walking around with the ticking-time-bomb, double-whammy set up of background inflammation plus a dearth of the nutrients you need to manage inflammation and infection!
Besides finding weaknesses for critical immune-supporting nutrients (iron, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin D, protein ), nutrition screenings can pick up inflammation signals on routine bloodwork. I screen for this stuff and fix it in my pediatric nutrition practice. Parents are often pleasantly surprised when, after working with me, their kids rarely get sick (and they have more energy, sleep better, and are happier too).
I believe that part of the variation we are seeing in covid infections and deaths is directly related to nutrition. Nutrition assessment is not part of routine pediatric care, and advising families on how to navigate nutrition concerns for kids certainly isn’t either! When was the last time your pediatrician told you what to make for dinner, or how to pack a lunch your picky eater would actually finish? Lol. Never. Here are five ways to build a strong immunity-foundation for your kids:
1 – Feed Your Kids – Lots! The one factor that most determines how a child weathers an illness or infection is nutrition status. And, the single most important nutrition parameter for a child is growth pattern. This is the single most important nutrition parameter for a child, period. Not whether they eat fermented food, follow a GAPS diet, or never eat sugar. Nope. In children, when it comes to fighting infection, it’s all about body resources and nutrient stores. So, make sure that your kids maintain a healthy weight before illness strikes. Underweight children as well as overweight kids are more likely to get sick more often, stay sick longer, and have more complications than children in normal weight status. This fact is based on decades of global data on childhood illness and child mortality. Because the immune system pulls on stored nutrient resources during illness, and because some of those resources are stored protein and energy in our own tissues, even slightly underweight children can have higher risk for infections and poor outcomes. Your child does not have to be visibly emaciated or even below the 5th percentile for weight for age, in order to be clinically underweight. Your doctor may not have noticed a growth impairment, so visit my blog on underweight in children to see if your child falls in this category.
2 – Probiotics Help Lungs Too
3 – Use Antioxidants During Illness
4 – Use Immune Modulating and Virus-Killing Herbal Supports
5 – Give Direct Immune Support
We may be facing the reality that there is no safe or effective vaccine for covid for a long time, if ever. As we learned before from the SARS virus, corona virus vaccines are exquisitely challenging to create.Two-thirds of those polled expressed that they would not take a covid vaccine, due to safety concerns. In the meantime, take action to support your kids’ immune systems so they can be as ready as possible. Bonus – they may breeze through winter with no colds or flu bugs at all!